Alabama State
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,182  Artrailia Lesane SO 21:44
1,235  Paige Rankine SO 21:48
2,170  Kimberly Wedderburn JR 22:46
2,709  Tatiana Etienne FR 23:24
2,756  Shantia Wilson SO 23:28
3,032  Soyong Smith SR 23:55
3,240  Santina Williams SO 24:26
3,373  Jerrica Mahone JR 24:49
3,686  Markia Bartley FR 26:27
National Rank #259 of 340
South Region Rank #33 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Artrailia Lesane Paige Rankine Kimberly Wedderburn Tatiana Etienne Shantia Wilson Soyong Smith Santina Williams Jerrica Mahone Markia Bartley
BSC Invitational 10/04 1299 21:17 21:27 23:21 23:12 24:37 23:16 24:09 25:17
Coach O Invitational 10/12 1364 21:49 22:12 23:31 23:21 24:26 24:12 24:46 26:09
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1284 21:36 21:33 22:16 23:20 23:03 23:41 25:20 26:50
SWAC Championships 10/28 1291 21:56 21:47 22:43 22:42 23:20 23:42 24:26 24:24 26:41
South Region Championships 11/15 1362 21:49 21:56 22:45 25:07 23:21 25:05 25:00





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.6 803 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.9 2.7 3.7 6.8 9.6 13.3 16.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Artrailia Lesane 102.4
Paige Rankine 107.3
Kimberly Wedderburn 170.3
Tatiana Etienne 208.5
Shantia Wilson 213.3
Soyong Smith 237.0
Santina Williams 257.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.2% 0.2 22
23 0.7% 0.7 23
24 1.2% 1.2 24
25 1.9% 1.9 25
26 2.7% 2.7 26
27 3.7% 3.7 27
28 6.8% 6.8 28
29 9.6% 9.6 29
30 13.3% 13.3 30
31 16.2% 16.2 31
32 18.8% 18.8 32
33 22.6% 22.6 33
34 2.0% 2.0 34
35 0.1% 0.1 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0